itsaplane
08-27-2006, 12:19 AM
I've got an attended laundromat with quite a bit of wash & fold and it's fair to say that MY EMPLOYEES ARE DRIVING ME NUTS!!!!
Okay, I'm feeling a little better now. But here's the thing - I've got an employee who always seems to need some time off - to go to the dentist, to go out of town for the weekend, to do this, to do that!
Now, I'm an accomodating kind of guy (part of the problem???), so I try to let my 3 attendants (one is 32 hrs/wk, the other two are 16 hrs/wk) trade shifts for their mutual convenience. But, this always creates problems - the other attendants say it's not fair that they frequently have to fill in (I guess they don't need the money!) and it's a pain in the neck for me to have to referee.
Worst of all, it looks like my best attendant is ready to quit over it all (maybe she's not that good after all).
What solutions would you recommend? I'm leaning toward instituting a time-off rule for *planned* absences - similar to accruing some vacation time for every hour they work. But, this kind of procedure adds complexity.
The other issue is that, with a small three person work force, arranging subs can be hard (or impossible). Should this also be a requirement? "I'm sorry but, if there's no one to work for you, you're required to work your shift!"
And, if someone just can't work (and doesn't have accrued time off or a subsitute), am I then given the choice of (somehow) accomodating or firing them?
On the other side of the equation, maybe I could offer an incentive to employees who take fill-in shifts. Like a dollar an hour more? I guess I'd be the one who had to pay that...
Makes me want to go unattended!
Okay, I'm feeling a little better now. But here's the thing - I've got an employee who always seems to need some time off - to go to the dentist, to go out of town for the weekend, to do this, to do that!
Now, I'm an accomodating kind of guy (part of the problem???), so I try to let my 3 attendants (one is 32 hrs/wk, the other two are 16 hrs/wk) trade shifts for their mutual convenience. But, this always creates problems - the other attendants say it's not fair that they frequently have to fill in (I guess they don't need the money!) and it's a pain in the neck for me to have to referee.
Worst of all, it looks like my best attendant is ready to quit over it all (maybe she's not that good after all).
What solutions would you recommend? I'm leaning toward instituting a time-off rule for *planned* absences - similar to accruing some vacation time for every hour they work. But, this kind of procedure adds complexity.
The other issue is that, with a small three person work force, arranging subs can be hard (or impossible). Should this also be a requirement? "I'm sorry but, if there's no one to work for you, you're required to work your shift!"
And, if someone just can't work (and doesn't have accrued time off or a subsitute), am I then given the choice of (somehow) accomodating or firing them?
On the other side of the equation, maybe I could offer an incentive to employees who take fill-in shifts. Like a dollar an hour more? I guess I'd be the one who had to pay that...
Makes me want to go unattended!